HS-TC-01 / TCO vs cloud
The math behind
on-prem vs rent.
Pick a tier, the workload class, GPU-hours/month, your current $/GPU-hour, and the assessment window — read payback in months, cloud total vs Helmstone purchase + amortized support, and the 3-year line. Hands off to /quote with the tier preselected and the summary folded into your brief.
HS-TC-02 / Run
Pick the four knobs. Read the line.
The math runs server-side against the published starting prices on /tiers ; what you see is a per-interaction TCO row, not a smoothed median. Negative savings are surfaced honestly — at very low cloud spend the math has Helmstone costing more; the page calls it.
Configuration
Pick a tier and the cloud-spend assumption.
Math reruns on every change. The Helmstone purchase line is the published starting price; the cloud side is your current GPU-hours × current $/GPU-h on the equivalent cloud SKU.
Tier
One full-TDP GPU × one wall-clock hour = 1 GPU-hour. Multi-GPU jobs scale equivalent hours.
Default is the per-tier pinned cloud baseline — override if your quote sheet is different.
Pre-fills the tier and the TCO summary on /quote so a sales engineer replies with a build pinned to your spend.
Result
Computing…
For Helmstone W1 over 36 months. Numbers refresh as you change tier, workload class, GPU-hours, $/GPU-hour, or the window.
- Cloud total over window
- —
- Helmstone purchase (one-time)
- —
- Helmstone support (window)
- —
- Payback period
- —
- 3-year savings
- —
- Citation
- —
12% of purchase · per tier
HS-TC-03 / Sources
Where each row comes from.
The Helmstone side is the published starting price on /tiers. The cloud side is a pinned per-GPU-hour snapshot per tier — no live AWS / GCP fetch, no fabricated “median”. Override the cloud side with your own quote and the math re-runs the same way.
Helmstone starting prices →
The four published rows on /tiers — From $6,400 / $24,900 / $89,000 / $189,000. Founder-pending rows flagged on the catalog.
Pinned cloud $/GPU-h →
W1 $2.53/h baseline (A100/H100 on-demand); W2 dual-Pro 6000 cloud baseline; W4 multi-B200 cluster; RS multi-rack. Workload modifier adds 5% for sustained inference.
Support rate (amortized) →
12% of purchase / yr for W1 / W2; 10% for W4 / RS. Scales linearly with the assessment window in months.
Hand-off to /quote →
The Bring-this-to-/quote button pins the tier, the workload, GPU-hours, $/GPU-h, and the window into the brief so a sales engineer replies with a build pinned to your spend.
48-hour burn-in (the validation under the math) →
The published W1 burn-in profile grounds the workloads the calculator assumes — the same methodology applies to every tier on the catalog.
Compare vs DIY (the integrator-vs-build decision) →
The configurator page is the bridge between browsing and a quote — the TCO page is the financial justification that side-steps the build-vs-buy conversation.
HS-TC-04 / Hand-off
Bring this to /quote.
The TCO summary travels with the quote brief — a sales engineer replies within one business day with the SKU pinned to your spend, a configuration, a benchmark target, and a quote.
What we hand off
- •Selected tier, GPU spec, SKU
- •Workload class (fine-tune vs sustained inference)
- •GPU-hours per month · current $/GPU-hour
- •Chosen assessment window (12 / 24 / 36 mo)
- •Cloud total · Helmstone total · 3-year savings